{"id":13676,"date":"2026-07-15T01:58:35","date_gmt":"2026-07-15T01:58:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/?p=13676"},"modified":"2026-07-15T02:07:35","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T02:07:35","slug":"iso-13485-abrasive-blasting-special-process-validation-medical-device","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/resource\/blog\/iso-13485-abrasive-blasting-special-process-validation-medical-device\/","title":{"rendered":"ISO 13485 Compliance for Abrasive Blasting: How to Validate Surface Treatment as a Special Process in Medical Device Manufacturing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\n    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n    \"@graph\": [\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"headline\": \"ISO 13485 Compliance for Abrasive Blasting: How to Validate Surface Treatment as a Special Process in Medical Device Manufacturing\",\n            \"description\": \"Complete guide to validating abrasive blasting as a special process under ISO 13485 \\u2014 special process definition, IQ\\\/OQ\\\/PQ protocol design, process documentation, supplier qualification, change control, CAPA, and FDA QMSR alignment.\",\n            \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-13\",\n            \"dateModified\": \"2026-07-13\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"Jiangsu Henglihong Technology Co., Ltd.\",\n                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/hlh-js.com\\\/\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"Jiangsu Henglihong Technology Co., Ltd.\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/hlh-js.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/hlh-logo.png\"\n                }\n            },\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/hlh-js.com\\\/resource\\\/blog\\\/iso-13485-abrasive-blasting-special-process-validation-medical-device\\\/\"\n            }\n        },\n        {\n            \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n            \"mainEntity\": [\n                {\n                    \"@type\": \"Question\",\n                    \"name\": \"Why is abrasive blasting classified as a special process under ISO 13485?\",\n                    \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                        \"text\": \"ISO 13485 defines a special process as any process whose outputs cannot be fully verified by subsequent product inspection without destructive testing. Abrasive blasting qualifies because the critical output \\u2014 surface roughness, contamination level, residual stress state \\u2014 cannot be fully verified by inspection of finished devices without destructive testing (cross-section SEM, XPS, residual stress measurement). Only statistical sampling of Ra by profilometry is practical in production, and even complete Ra conformance does not verify contamination state or work-hardened layer condition. Therefore, the process itself must be validated to demonstrate that consistently operating within defined parameter limits produces surfaces that consistently meet specification.\"\n                    }\n                },\n                {\n                    \"@type\": \"Question\",\n                    \"name\": \"What is the difference between IQ, OQ, and PQ in blasting process validation?\",\n                    \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                        \"text\": \"IQ (Installation Qualification) verifies that the blasting equipment is installed correctly, operates as the manufacturer specifies, and is calibrated. OQ (Operational Qualification) establishes the process parameter ranges \\u2014 determining what blast pressure, media size, nozzle distance, and dwell time settings produce surfaces within the Ra specification, and what the edge of the acceptable range is. PQ (Performance Qualification) demonstrates that the process consistently produces conforming surfaces when operated within the OQ-established parameter window, run on production-representative parts across multiple batches by multiple operators on multiple days. All three must be completed and documented before the process is used for production of devices destined for human use.\"\n                    }\n                },\n                {\n                    \"@type\": \"Question\",\n                    \"name\": \"What documents are required to validate abrasive blasting under ISO 13485?\",\n                    \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                        \"text\": \"Required documentation for abrasive blasting process validation under ISO 13485 includes: a Process Validation Plan (scope, responsibilities, acceptance criteria); IQ protocol and report (equipment specification, calibration certificates, utilities verification); OQ protocol and report (parameter range studies, Ra vs parameter data, work-hardened layer characterization, cleaning validation); PQ protocol and report (multi-batch, multi-operator, multi-day repeatability data); Process Specification or Device Master Record (DMR) entry defining locked process parameters; operator training records; equipment maintenance and calibration schedule; media specification with Certificate of Analysis requirements; and cleanliness test method validation. All documents are retained per the organization's document control and record retention procedures.\"\n                    }\n                },\n                {\n                    \"@type\": \"Question\",\n                    \"name\": \"What constitutes a process change that requires re-validation of blasting?\",\n                    \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                        \"text\": \"Under ISO 13485 change control, any change that could affect the validated process output requires formal review and potentially re-validation. For blasting, significant changes triggering re-validation assessment include: change in blasting media type (e.g., Al\\u2082O\\u2083 to TiO\\u2082), change in media particle size range, change in media supplier or manufacturing process, change in blast equipment (new cabinet, new nozzle type), change in process parameters outside the OQ-established validated range, change in part material or geometry affecting blast access, and change in post-blast cleaning process. Minor changes within the validated range (e.g., pressure adjustment within the OQ-proven window) are documented but do not require re-validation if the OQ demonstrated process capability across the full parameter range.\"\n                    }\n                },\n                {\n                    \"@type\": \"Question\",\n                    \"name\": \"What does ISO 13485 require for qualifying a contract blasting supplier?\",\n                    \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                        \"text\": \"ISO 13485 Section 7.4 requires medical device manufacturers to evaluate and select suppliers based on their ability to supply products conforming to the organization's requirements. For contract blasting suppliers, this means: initial qualification assessment (quality system audit, review of their process capability data, review of their calibration and maintenance records); approval and listing on the Approved Supplier List (ASL); defined purchasing requirements (purchase orders specifying process parameters, media specification, certificate requirements, traceability); ongoing monitoring (periodic re-audit, incoming inspection or first-article inspection, supplier performance metrics); and formal processes for supplier change notification and re-qualification when the supplier changes equipment, media, or processes affecting the blasted device surface.\"\n                    }\n                },\n                {\n                    \"@type\": \"Question\",\n                    \"name\": \"How does the FDA QMSR (effective 2026) affect abrasive blasting validation requirements?\",\n                    \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n                        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n                        \"text\": \"The FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR, 21 CFR Part 820 as amended, effective February 2, 2026) directly incorporates ISO 13485:2016 as its technical basis, replacing most of the previous QSR with alignment to the ISO standard. For abrasive blasting as a special process, the practical effect of QMSR is convergence of U.S. and international requirements: process validation per IQ\\\/OQ\\\/PQ, supplier controls, change control, and document\\\/record retention requirements under QMSR are now substantively equivalent to ISO 13485 requirements. Device manufacturers selling in both the U.S. and international markets can maintain a single quality management system satisfying both regulators, rather than maintaining separate U.S. and international process validation packages.\"\n                    }\n                }\n            ]\n        }\n    ]\n}<\/script> <style>\r\n.hlh-reg*,.hlh-reg*::before,.hlh-reg*::after{box-sizing:border-box;margin:0;padding:0}\r\n.hlh-reg{font-family:'Segoe UI',Arial,sans-serif;font-size:16px;line-height:1.78;color:#1e2a38;max-width:860px;margin:0 auto;padding:0 20px 64px}\r\n.hlh-reg h1{font-size:clamp(1.65rem,3.5vw,2.2rem);font-weight:800;color:#1a3456;line-height:1.22;margin-bottom:20px}\r\n.hlh-reg h2{font-size:clamp(1.18rem,2.5vw,1.46rem);font-weight:700;color:#1a3456;border-left:4px solid #d86e18;padding-left:14px;margin:50px 0 16px}\r\n.hlh-reg h3{font-size:1.05rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a3456;margin:28px 0 10px}\r\n.hlh-reg p{margin-bottom:16px}\r\n.hlh-reg ul,.hlh-reg ol{padding-left:22px;margin-bottom:16px}\r\n.hlh-reg li{margin-bottom:7px}\r\n.hlh-reg a{color:#d86e18;text-decoration:none}\r\n.hlh-reg a:hover{text-decoration:underline}\r\n.hlh-reg strong{color:#1a3456}\r\n.hlh-reg-hero{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#1a3456,#234572);color:#fff;border-radius:10px;padding:38px 34px;margin-bottom:44px}\r\n.hlh-reg-hero-tag{font-size:.76rem;font-weight:700;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.1em;color:#d86e18;margin-bottom:12px}\r\n.hlh-reg-hero p{color:rgba(255,255,255,.88);font-size:1.02rem;margin-bottom:0;line-height:1.7}\r\n.hlh-reg-toc{background:#f4f7fb;border:1px solid #d0dae8;border-radius:8px;padding:22px 26px;margin-bottom:48px}\r\n.hlh-reg-toc-label{font-size:.78rem;font-weight:700;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.07em;color:#1a3456;margin-bottom:14px}\r\n.hlh-reg-toc ol{padding-left:20px;margin-bottom:0}\r\n.hlh-reg-toc li{margin-bottom:5px;font-size:.9rem}\r\n.hlh-reg-toc a{color:#1a3456}.hlh-reg-toc a:hover{color:#d86e18}\r\n.hlh-reg-callout{border-left:4px solid #d86e18;background:#fff8f2;padding:16px 20px;border-radius:0 6px 6px 0;margin:24px 0;font-size:.96rem}\r\n.hlh-reg-callout strong{color:#d86e18;display:block;margin-bottom:4px}\r\n.hlh-reg-table-wrap{overflow-x:auto;margin:22px 0 30px}\r\n.hlh-reg-table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:.88rem}\r\n.hlh-reg-table th{background:#1a3456;color:#fff;padding:10px 14px;text-align:left;font-weight:600}\r\n.hlh-reg-table td{padding:9px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e0e8f0;vertical-align:top}\r\n.hlh-reg-table tr:nth-child(even) td{background:#f4f7fb}\r\n.hlh-reg-table td:first-child{font-weight:600;color:#1a3456}\r\n.hlh-reg-steps{margin:24px 0}\r\n.hlh-reg-step{display:flex;gap:16px;align-items:flex-start;margin-bottom:22px}\r\n.hlh-reg-step-num{flex-shrink:0;width:38px;height:38px;background:#d86e18;color:#fff;border-radius:50%;display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:center;font-weight:700;font-size:.9rem;margin-top:2px}\r\n.hlh-reg-step-body h3{margin:0 0 5px;font-size:1rem}\r\n.hlh-reg-step-body p{margin:0;font-size:.93rem;color:#334455}\r\n.hlh-reg-phase{border:1px solid #d0dae8;border-radius:8px;padding:22px;margin-bottom:18px;background:#fff}\r\n.hlh-reg-phase h3{font-size:1rem;margin:0 0 14px;color:#1a3456;display:flex;align-items:center;gap:10px}\r\n.hlh-reg-phase h3 span{background:#1a3456;color:#fff;font-size:.78rem;padding:2px 9px;border-radius:12px;font-weight:700}\r\n.hlh-reg-phase ul{padding-left:20px;margin:0}\r\n.hlh-reg-phase li{font-size:.88rem;margin-bottom:6px;color:#334455}\r\n.hlh-reg-checklist{background:#f4f7fb;border-radius:8px;padding:22px 24px;margin:24px 0}\r\n.hlh-reg-checklist h3{font-size:1rem;margin:0 0 14px;color:#1a3456}\r\n.hlh-reg-checklist ul{padding-left:0;list-style:none;margin:0}\r\n.hlh-reg-checklist li{font-size:.88rem;color:#334455;margin-bottom:8px;padding-left:24px;position:relative}\r\n.hlh-reg-checklist li::before{content:\"\u2610\";position:absolute;left:0;color:#d86e18;font-size:.9rem}\r\n.hlh-reg-related{background:#f4f7fb;border-radius:8px;padding:22px 24px;margin:48px 0 32px}\r\n.hlh-reg-related h3{font-size:1rem;margin:0 0 14px;color:#1a3456}\r\n.hlh-reg-related a{display:block;font-size:.9rem;color:#d86e18;margin-bottom:8px}\r\n.hlh-reg-back{display:inline-flex;align-items:center;gap:6px;font-size:.88rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a3456;border:1px solid #d0dae8;border-radius:5px;padding:8px 14px;margin-bottom:40px;text-decoration:none}\r\n.hlh-reg-back:hover{border-color:#d86e18;color:#d86e18;text-decoration:none}\r\n.hlh-reg-faq-item{border-bottom:1px solid #d0dae8}\r\n.hlh-reg-faq-btn{width:100%;background:none;border:none;cursor:pointer;display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;padding:16px 0;font-size:.97rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a3456;text-align:left;gap:12px;font-family:inherit}\r\n.hlh-reg-faq-btn:hover{color:#d86e18}\r\n.hlh-reg-faq-icon{flex-shrink:0;width:22px;height:22px;border:2px solid #d86e18;border-radius:50%;display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:center;font-size:1rem;color:#d86e18;transition:transform .25s}\r\n.hlh-reg-faq-btn[aria-expanded=\"true\"] .hlh-reg-faq-icon{transform:rotate(45deg)}\r\n.hlh-reg-faq-answer{overflow:hidden;max-height:0;transition:max-height .32s ease}\r\n.hlh-reg-faq-answer p{padding-bottom:18px;font-size:.93rem;color:#334455;margin:0}\r\n.hlh-reg-cta{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#1a3456,#234572);color:#fff;border-radius:10px;padding:38px 34px;text-align:center;margin-top:56px}\r\n.hlh-reg-cta h2{color:#fff;border:none;padding:0;margin:0 0 12px;font-size:1.4rem}\r\n.hlh-reg-cta p{color:rgba(255,255,255,.85);margin-bottom:24px}\r\n.hlh-reg-cta a{display:inline-block;background:#d86e18;color:#fff;font-weight:700;padding:13px 30px;border-radius:5px;font-size:.96rem;text-decoration:none}\r\n.hlh-reg-cta a:hover{background:#b85c12;text-decoration:none}\r\n@media(max-width:600px){.hlh-reg-hero,.hlh-reg-cta{padding:26px 18px}}\r\n<\/style><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg\"><a class=\"hlh-reg-back\" href=\"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/resource\/blog\/abrasive-blasting-surface-treatment-medical-devices\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u2190 Abrasive Blasting for Medical Devices: Complete Guide<\/a>\r\n<h1>ISO 13485 Compliance for Abrasive Blasting: How to Validate Surface Treatment as a Special Process in Medical Device Manufacturing<\/h1>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-hero\">\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-hero-tag\">In-Depth Guide \u00b7 Medical Device Series \u00b7 C12<\/div>\r\n<p>Every abrasive blasting operation that touches a regulated medical device component is a special process under ISO 13485 \u2014 and special processes must be validated, not merely inspected. This distinction carries significant compliance weight. You cannot release a lot of blasted orthopedic implants based on visual inspection and assume the surface is correct. You must demonstrate, through documented validation, that your process consistently produces surfaces within specification when operated within defined parameter limits. This guide covers the complete validation framework: how to identify and scope the special process, how to design and execute IQ, OQ, and PQ studies, what documentation the Device Master Record and Device History Record must contain, how to qualify and audit contract blasting suppliers, and how to manage change control and maintain compliance through the product lifecycle.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<nav class=\"hlh-reg-toc\" aria-label=\"\u76ee\u6b21\">\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-toc-label\">Table of Contents<\/div>\r\n<ol>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-definition\">Special Process Definition: Why Blasting Qualifies<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-scope\">Scoping the Validation: What to Include<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-iq\">Installation Qualification (IQ): Equipment and Utilities<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-oq\">Operational Qualification (OQ): Parameter Range and Process Characterization<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-pq\">Performance Qualification (PQ): Demonstrating Consistent Output<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-docs\">Documentation: DMR, DHR, and Process Records<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-supplier\">Contract Blasting Supplier Qualification<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-change\">Change Control: What Triggers Re-Validation<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-capa\">CAPA Integration and Deviation Management<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-fda\">FDA QMSR Alignment (Effective February 2026)<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-audit\">Audit Preparation Checklist<\/a><\/li>\r\n<li><a href=\"#rg-faq\">\u3088\u304f\u3042\u308b\u8cea\u554f<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/nav>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-definition\">1. Special Process Definition: Why Blasting Qualifies<\/h2>\r\n<p>ISO 13485:2016 Section 7.5.6 states: &#8220;Where the resulting output cannot be verified by subsequent monitoring or measurement, the organization shall validate any such processes.&#8221; This is the special process clause \u2014 the requirement that defines a distinct compliance obligation for blasting, passivation, heat treatment, sterilization, coating, welding, and any other process where the critical output properties cannot be fully and cost-effectively verified on the finished product without destructive testing.<\/p>\r\n<p>Abrasive blasting meets this definition for the following reasons:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Surface roughness (Ra):<\/strong> Can be measured by profilometry on production parts, but only on accessible surfaces. Complex implant geometries have surfaces \u2014 inner threads, recesses, curved zones \u2014 where in-process stylus measurement is impractical. And 100% measurement of all production parts is economically prohibitive, so statistical sampling is used, meaning the unmeasured portions of unmeasured lots are released on process confidence, not direct measurement.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Contamination state (alumina embedding, free iron):<\/strong> Cannot be verified by routine production inspection. XPS and EDS analysis for alumina contamination requires laboratory-grade vacuum instruments and is not a production measurement. Free iron contamination is detected by the copper sulfate or ferroxyl test for stainless, but not for titanium. The cleanliness of blasted titanium implants is released on process confidence, not direct contamination measurement per lot.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Residual stress state:<\/strong> Compressive residual stress from bead blasting cannot be measured by standard production inspection methods. X-ray diffraction (XRD) residual stress measurement is a research and validation tool, not a production release tool.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Work-hardened layer:<\/strong> Cannot be measured nondestructively in production.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>Since these critical properties cannot all be fully verified per lot without destructive testing, the process must be validated to create confidence that consistently operating within defined parameter limits produces surfaces consistently meeting all specifications.<\/p>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-scope\">2. Scoping the Validation: What to Include<\/h2>\r\n<p>The validation scope must be clearly defined before any study begins. Key scoping decisions:<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Which devices and device families:<\/strong> Devices with similar geometry, material, and surface specification may be bracketed under a single validation if the bracketing logic is defensible. For example, a family of hip stem sizes in Ti-6Al-4V ELI with the same Ra specification and same accessible geometry can be validated by testing the smallest and largest sizes (worst-case geometry bracket).<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Which surfaces within the device:<\/strong> The validation covers the specific surfaces subject to blasting as defined in the device drawing or surface specification. Masked surfaces, articulating surfaces, and out-of-scope features are identified and excluded.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Which process steps:<\/strong> The complete blasting process sequence \u2014 pre-cleaning, blasting, post-blast cleaning, passivation or downstream treatment \u2014 must be validated as a system, not just the blasting step in isolation. The cleaning validation must demonstrate media residue removal, and the passivation or coating validation confirms the blasted surface supports downstream treatment performance.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Which equipment:<\/strong> Specific blast cabinet(s) and nozzle configurations. Equipment that may be used interchangeably must be specifically identified and separately characterized in OQ.<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-callout\"><strong>Bracketing strategy for implant families:<\/strong> If a Ti-6Al-4V hip stem family spans sizes 8\u201316 (approximately 110\u2013170 mm long, 10\u201330 mm proximal width), validation on the smallest (most accessible challenge for uniformity) and largest (most material volume, most surface area) sizes provides a bracket that supports release of intermediate sizes if the validation protocol defines the bracketing logic and demonstrates equivalent surface access and Ra consistency at both extremes.<\/div>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-iq\">3. Installation Qualification (IQ): Equipment and Utilities<\/h2>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-phase\">\r\n<h3>IQ Objectives and Deliverables Phase 1<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Verify the blast cabinet, pressure regulator, media classifier, and all components are installed per the manufacturer&#8217;s specifications and the organization&#8217;s engineering drawings.<\/li>\r\n<li>Verify calibration of all measuring instruments: pressure gauges (calibrated to traceable pressure standard), nozzle-distance measurement tools, Ra profilometer (calibrated per ISO 12179), thermometers for acid bath (if in-scope), and timer\/cycle controllers.<\/li>\r\n<li>Verify utilities (compressed air supply, quality, moisture content, filtration; electrical power; ventilation; blast media recirculation and classification system).<\/li>\r\n<li>Verify equipment identification (asset tag, serial number) for traceability in device history records.<\/li>\r\n<li>Collect and retain: equipment manufacturer&#8217;s specification documents, calibration certificates for all instruments, installation inspection records, utility verification records.<\/li>\r\n<li>Document any deviations from planned installation and their disposition (resolved, accepted with rationale, or escalated).<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-oq\">4. Operational Qualification (OQ): Parameter Range and Process Characterization<\/h2>\r\n<p>OQ answers the question: what parameter settings reliably produce surfaces within specification? The OQ study systematically varies blasting parameters across their intended operating range to characterize the Ra response surface and establish the validated parameter window.<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-phase\">\r\n<h3>OQ Study Design Phase 2<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Parameters studied:<\/strong> Blast pressure (typically \u00b11 bar around nominal), media particle size distribution (nominal and boundary lots), nozzle distance (\u00b120 mm around nominal), dwell time or cycle count (nominal and extremes), nozzle angle (if variable).<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Response measured:<\/strong> Ra on representative coupons or device blanks at each parameter combination; media change-interval endpoint Ra (to establish media replacement criterion); post-blast Ra after cleaning (to confirm cleaning doesn&#8217;t alter surface); cleanliness verification (particle count or gravimetric per ISO 16232) at nominal and worst-case cleaning parameters.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Experimental design:<\/strong> One-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) studies or designed experiments (full or fractional factorial) depending on resource and timeline. OFAT is simpler to execute and document but misses interaction effects. DOE is more rigorous and is preferred for processes with multiple interacting variables.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Acceptance criteria for OQ:<\/strong> All Ra measurements within the validated window must fall within the device specification range. The parameter window is set conservatively inside the demonstrated boundaries \u2014 typically with guard bands of at least one parameter step from the specification limit to account for normal production variation.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Work-hardened layer characterization:<\/strong> At least one cross-section SEM study at nominal parameters confirms the work-hardened layer depth and that it is fully removed by the acid etch step (if applicable).<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Contamination characterization:<\/strong> XPS or EDS analysis at nominal parameters characterizes surface Al (for Al\u2082O\u2083 processes) or Si (for glass bead processes) to establish baseline contamination level for biocompatibility context.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-table-wrap\">\r\n<table class=\"hlh-reg-table\">\r\n<thead>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th>\u30d1\u30e9\u30e1\u30fc\u30bf<\/th>\r\n<th>Nominal<\/th>\r\n<th>OQ Low<\/th>\r\n<th>OQ High<\/th>\r\n<th>Validated Window<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Blast pressure (bar)<\/td>\r\n<td>3.5<\/td>\r\n<td>2.5<\/td>\r\n<td>5.0<\/td>\r\n<td>3.0\u20134.5 bar (based on OQ Ra data)<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Media particle size (\u03bcm)<\/td>\r\n<td>250\u2013500<\/td>\r\n<td>200\u2013450<\/td>\r\n<td>300\u2013550<\/td>\r\n<td>230\u2013520 \u03bcm (boundary lots demonstrate spec conformance)<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Nozzle distance (mm)<\/td>\r\n<td>75<\/td>\r\n<td>55<\/td>\r\n<td>100<\/td>\r\n<td>60\u201395 mm<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Cycle count<\/td>\r\n<td>3 passes<\/td>\r\n<td>2 passes<\/td>\r\n<td>5 passes<\/td>\r\n<td>2\u20134 passes (Ra plateau confirmed at 3+ passes)<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Media change interval<\/td>\r\n<td>Every 200 parts<\/td>\r\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\r\n<td>300 parts (studied)<\/td>\r\n<td>Every 200 parts (conservative; Ra drift observed at 250 in OQ)<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-pq\">5. Performance Qualification (PQ): Demonstrating Consistent Output<\/h2>\r\n<p>PQ answers the question: when the process is operated at the validated parameters by production personnel using production media, does it consistently produce conforming surfaces across the realistic range of production variation \u2014 different operators, different shifts, different days, different media lots?<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-phase\">\r\n<h3>PQ Study Design Phase 3<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Number of runs:<\/strong> Minimum 3 independent production runs (typically interpreted as 3 separate lots\/batches), run on different days by different qualified operators. Each run uses a fresh, independently verified media lot.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Parts:<\/strong> Production-representative parts (same material, geometry, and surface specification as production devices). If blanks or coupons were used in OQ, PQ must use actual device parts.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Measurements:<\/strong> Ra at defined measurement locations per device per run. Minimum sample size per lot per location is statistically determined based on the required process capability (Cpk \u2265 1.33 is a common requirement; smaller sample sizes are acceptable for higher-confidence Cpk estimates).<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Acceptance criteria:<\/strong> All Ra measurements within specification; process Cpk \u2265 defined minimum (e.g., 1.33); no lot failures; cleanliness conformance at each run; passivation acceptance (if in scope) at each run.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Operator qualification:<\/strong> Each operator who will perform the process in production must be trained and their training documented before performing PQ runs. Operator training records are part of the PQ package.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-docs\">6. Documentation: DMR, DHR, and Process Records<\/h2>\r\n<p>ISO 13485 requires that the process and its execution be documented in two complementary record systems:<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Device Master Record (DMR) \/ Technical File:<\/strong> The DMR contains the definition of the validated process \u2014 what must be done. For blasting, this includes: the process specification (locked parameters, media specification, acceptance criteria); the surface specification (Ra range, measurement method, sampling plan); the cleaning specification; operator qualification requirements; equipment calibration schedule; and reference to the validation study reports that established these parameters.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Device History Record (DHR):<\/strong> The DHR contains evidence that the process was executed correctly for each production lot \u2014 what was done. For each blasted lot, the DHR must include: batch\/lot number; date of processing; operator identification; blast cabinet identifier; pressure gauge readings; media lot number and certificate; cycle count or dwell time; Ra measurement results with instrument calibration reference; passivation or downstream process records; and final disposition (accept\/reject).<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-callout\"><strong>Electronic records:<\/strong> DHR entries may be paper or electronic per ISO 13485 Section 4.2.5. Electronic systems must control access, maintain audit trails, and prevent unauthorized modification per 21 CFR Part 11 (FDA) or equivalent national regulations. Cloud-based MES\/ERP systems with validated 21 CFR Part 11 modules are increasingly used for DHR management in medical device manufacturing.<\/div>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-supplier\">7. Contract Blasting Supplier Qualification<\/h2>\r\n<p>When blasting is performed by a contract service provider rather than internally, ISO 13485 Section 7.4 (Purchasing) applies. The device manufacturer is responsible for the quality of all purchased services, including contract blasting, and must:<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-steps\">\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step\">\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step-num\">1<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step-body\">\r\n<h3>Initial Supplier Qualification<\/h3>\r\n<p>Evaluate the supplier&#8217;s quality management system (ISO 13485 certification is preferred; ISO 9001 is a minimum baseline). Audit the supplier&#8217;s facility to verify blast equipment, calibration records, process control practices, operator training, and record-keeping. Obtain the supplier&#8217;s process capability data (if available) or conduct a qualification run to establish capability. Approve and list on the organization&#8217;s Approved Supplier List (ASL).<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step\">\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step-num\">2<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step-body\">\r\n<h3>Purchasing Controls and Purchase Order Requirements<\/h3>\r\n<p>Purchase orders for contract blasting must specify: the applicable process specification (document number and revision); required media type, grade, and certificate requirements; blast parameters (or reference to the process specification); required Ra measurement (with method, sampling plan, and reporting requirement); required certificates or processing records to accompany each shipment; and change notification requirements (the supplier must notify the device manufacturer before making any process changes).<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step\">\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step-num\">3<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step-body\">\r\n<h3>Ongoing Supplier Monitoring<\/h3>\r\n<p>Establish incoming inspection or first-article verification requirements for blasted parts. Define supplier performance metrics (on-time delivery, non-conformance rate, customer complaints). Conduct periodic re-audits (frequency based on risk and supplier performance; typically annually for critical suppliers). Maintain supplier qualification records in the supplier file.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step\">\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step-num\">4<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-step-body\">\r\n<h3>Supplier Change Notification and Re-Qualification<\/h3>\r\n<p>The purchase agreement must require the supplier to notify the device manufacturer before any change to equipment, media type, media supplier, or process parameters. Upon notification, the device manufacturer evaluates the change impact and determines whether re-qualification studies are required before continued use of the supplier&#8217;s services.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-change\">8. Change Control: What Triggers Re-Validation<\/h2>\r\n<p>Once a blasting process is validated and locked in the DMR, any change must pass through the organization&#8217;s change control procedure before implementation. Changes must be evaluated for their potential impact on the validated process output (surface quality, contamination, cleanliness) and on the device&#8217;s safety and performance.<\/p>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-table-wrap\">\r\n<table class=\"hlh-reg-table\">\r\n<thead>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th>Change Type<\/th>\r\n<th>Impact Level<\/th>\r\n<th>Typical Action Required<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Media type change (e.g., Al\u2082O\u2083 \u2192 TiO\u2082)<\/td>\r\n<td>\u9ad8\u3044<\/td>\r\n<td>Full OQ and PQ re-validation on new media; biocompatibility impact assessment; potentially update ISO 10993 testing<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Media particle size change (within qualified window)<\/td>\r\n<td>Low\u2013Medium<\/td>\r\n<td>OQ confirmation run; no full re-validation if within validated OQ range<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Media supplier change (same grade\/specification)<\/td>\r\n<td>Medium<\/td>\r\n<td>Incoming inspection comparison study; equivalence data; if data supports equivalence, OQ not required; if not, mini-OQ needed<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Blast cabinet replacement (equivalent type)<\/td>\r\n<td>Medium\u2013High<\/td>\r\n<td>Full IQ on new equipment; OQ to confirm equivalent Ra in new cabinet; abbreviated PQ (1\u20132 runs)<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Blast pressure change within validated OQ window<\/td>\r\n<td>\u4f4e\u3044<\/td>\r\n<td>Change control record; no re-validation required; update DHR parameter record<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Device material change (different Ti alloy)<\/td>\r\n<td>\u9ad8\u3044<\/td>\r\n<td>Full OQ and PQ on new material; may require new device-specific validation<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Cleaning chemistry change<\/td>\r\n<td>Medium\u2013High<\/td>\r\n<td>Cleaning validation re-run to confirm residue removal on new chemistry; passivation verification<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>New operator (training only, no process change)<\/td>\r\n<td>\u4f4e\u3044<\/td>\r\n<td>Training qualification per training procedure; documented in training records; no re-validation<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-capa\">9. CAPA Integration and Deviation Management<\/h2>\r\n<p>Process deviations during blasting production \u2014 Ra results outside specification, equipment malfunction, media certification issue, cleaning failure \u2014 must be handled through the organization&#8217;s non-conformance and CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) system.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Immediate containment:<\/strong> Identify and quarantine the affected lot. Do not release to the next process step or to the customer until disposition is determined. The DHR for the lot must record the non-conformance.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Root cause investigation:<\/strong> Determine whether the deviation is attributable to a process parameter exceedance, equipment malfunction, media degradation, operator error, or measurement error. Each root cause category has a different corrective action path.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Lot disposition:<\/strong> Based on the root cause and the severity of the deviation, the lot may be accepted with deviation justification (if the Ra exceedance is minor and supported by data demonstrating the surface still meets biocompatibility requirements), reworked (re-blasted within the validated rework specification if one exists), or scrapped. The disposition rationale must be documented and approved by qualified personnel.<\/p>\r\n<p><strong>Corrective action:<\/strong> If the root cause reveals a systematic process issue \u2014 media drift beyond the change interval, pressure regulator calibration drift, operator training gap \u2014 a CAPA is opened to address the root cause and prevent recurrence. CAPAs for special process deviations may require process re-characterization, additional training, or equipment maintenance actions, and their effectiveness must be verified before closure.<\/p>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-fda\">10. FDA QMSR Alignment (Effective February 2026)<\/h2>\r\n<p>The FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), effective February 2, 2026, replaces the former 21 CFR Part 820 Quality System Regulation (QSR) with a framework directly aligned to ISO 13485:2016. For abrasive blasting as a special process, the practical implications of QMSR are:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li><strong>Convergent requirements:<\/strong> The special process validation requirements under QMSR (process validation for processes where output cannot be verified by inspection) are now substantively equivalent to ISO 13485 Section 7.5.6. A single IQ\/OQ\/PQ package satisfies both regulators for devices sold in the U.S. and internationally.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Design and Development Transfer:<\/strong> QMSR Section 820.130 (formerly Design Outputs) requires that blasting process specifications be adequately transferred from development to manufacturing. This means the validation package developed during design and development must be complete before production begins, and design changes that affect blasting (material change, geometry change) must go through the design change process with re-validation as appropriate.<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>Records:<\/strong> QMSR record requirements align with ISO 13485 Section 4.2.5. Electronic records used in blasting DHRs must comply with 21 CFR Part 11 if they are used to support regulated decisions (lot release, CAPA evidence).<\/li>\r\n<li><strong>FDA inspections:<\/strong> During FDA QSR\/QMSR inspections, blasting is a surface treatment process that inspectors may examine. Inspectors typically review: the process validation package, the DMR entry for the blasting process, a sample of DHRs showing process parameter records, operator training records, media certification records, and non-conformance records for any blasting-related deviations.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-audit\">11. Audit Preparation Checklist<\/h2>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-checklist\">\r\n<h3>Blasting Process Audit Readiness \u2014 Key Items<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Process validation plan, IQ report, OQ report, and PQ report \u2014 current revision, approval signatures, and effective date<\/li>\r\n<li>Device Master Record entry for blasting process \u2014 locked parameter specification, surface specification, sampling plan<\/li>\r\n<li>Media specification and approved supplier list entry for media supplier<\/li>\r\n<li>Certificate of Analysis for current media lot in use<\/li>\r\n<li>Blast equipment calibration records (pressure gauge, Ra profilometer) \u2014 current and within calibration interval<\/li>\r\n<li>Blast equipment maintenance log \u2014 last maintenance date, next due date<\/li>\r\n<li>Operator training records \u2014 all current operators trained and qualified per training procedure<\/li>\r\n<li>Sample DHRs from recent production lots \u2014 Ra measurement records, media lot references, operator ID, disposition records<\/li>\r\n<li>Non-conformance and CAPA records for any blasting-related deviations \u2014 open CAPAs with status; closed CAPAs with effectiveness verification<\/li>\r\n<li>Change control records for any blasting process changes since validation \u2014 change description, impact assessment, disposition<\/li>\r\n<li>Contract blasting supplier qualification file (if applicable) \u2014 audit report, ASL entry, purchase order template with requirements<\/li>\r\n<li>Media change interval log \u2014 evidence that media is being changed at or before the validated interval<\/li>\r\n<li>Cleanliness test records (if passivation or cleanliness verification is in-scope) \u2014 per-lot results<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-related\">\r\n<h3>Related Guides in This Series<\/h3>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/resource\/blog\/surface-roughness-medical-implants-ra-sa-osseointegration-specifications\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u2192 Surface Roughness for Medical Implants: Ra, Sa, and Measurement Standards<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/resource\/blog\/abrasive-media-medical-device-blasting-glass-beads-aluminum-oxide-tio2-zirconia-comparison\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u2192 Abrasive Media Comparison for Medical Device Blasting<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/resource\/blog\/abrasive-blasting-titanium-medical-implants-media-selection-alumina-contamination\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u2192 Titanium Medical Implants: Media and Contamination Guide<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/resource\/blog\/abrasive-blasting-surface-treatment-medical-devices\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u2190 Complete Guide: Abrasive Blasting for Medical Devices<\/a><\/div>\r\n<h2 id=\"rg-faq\">12. Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\r\n<div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-faq-item\"><button class=\"hlh-reg-faq-btn\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"rgq1\">Why is abrasive blasting a special process under ISO 13485?<span class=\"hlh-reg-faq-icon\">+<\/span><\/button>\r\n<div id=\"rgq1\" class=\"hlh-reg-faq-answer\">\r\n<p>Because its critical outputs \u2014 surface roughness, contamination state, residual stress \u2014 cannot all be fully verified by subsequent product inspection without destructive testing. Ra can be sampled by profilometry, but alumina contamination, work-hardened layer condition, and residual stress state require destructive or laboratory-grade analytical methods impractical for production release. Therefore the process itself must be validated to create justified confidence that consistent parameters produce consistent surfaces.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-faq-item\"><button class=\"hlh-reg-faq-btn\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"rgq2\">What is the difference between IQ, OQ, and PQ?<span class=\"hlh-reg-faq-icon\">+<\/span><\/button>\r\n<div id=\"rgq2\" class=\"hlh-reg-faq-answer\">\r\n<p>IQ verifies the equipment is installed correctly and calibrated. OQ establishes the process parameter ranges \u2014 what settings produce conforming Ra \u2014 and characterizes the process response surface. PQ demonstrates that the process consistently produces conforming surfaces when operated at the validated parameters by production personnel across multiple independent runs, operators, and days. All three must be documented before production release.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-faq-item\"><button class=\"hlh-reg-faq-btn\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"rgq3\">What documents are required for blasting process validation?<span class=\"hlh-reg-faq-icon\">+<\/span><\/button>\r\n<div id=\"rgq3\" class=\"hlh-reg-faq-answer\">\r\n<p>Process Validation Plan; IQ protocol and report (equipment specs, calibration certs); OQ protocol and report (parameter range studies, Ra vs parameter data, cleaning validation); PQ protocol and report (multi-batch, multi-operator repeatability data); DMR process specification (locked parameters, media spec, acceptance criteria); operator training records; equipment maintenance and calibration schedule; and media lot Certificate of Analysis requirements.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-faq-item\"><button class=\"hlh-reg-faq-btn\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"rgq4\">What changes trigger re-validation of blasting?<span class=\"hlh-reg-faq-icon\">+<\/span><\/button>\r\n<div id=\"rgq4\" class=\"hlh-reg-faq-answer\">\r\n<p>High-impact changes requiring re-validation: media type change (e.g., Al\u2082O\u2083 \u2192 TiO\u2082), blast equipment replacement, device material change. Medium-impact changes requiring equivalence study: media supplier change, cleaning chemistry change. Low-impact changes within validated windows: pressure adjustment within OQ range, new operator (training only). All changes go through formal change control assessment before implementation.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-faq-item\"><button class=\"hlh-reg-faq-btn\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"rgq5\">What does ISO 13485 require for qualifying a contract blasting supplier?<span class=\"hlh-reg-faq-icon\">+<\/span><\/button>\r\n<div id=\"rgq5\" class=\"hlh-reg-faq-answer\">\r\n<p>Initial qualification: quality system evaluation (preferably ISO 13485 certified), facility audit, process capability data, ASL listing. Ongoing controls: purchase orders specifying process parameters, media certs, and change notification requirements; incoming inspection or first-article verification; periodic re-audit; supplier performance metrics. The device manufacturer retains responsibility for the blasted surface quality regardless of who performs the operation.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-faq-item\"><button class=\"hlh-reg-faq-btn\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"rgq6\">How does the FDA QMSR affect blasting validation requirements?<span class=\"hlh-reg-faq-icon\">+<\/span><\/button>\r\n<div id=\"rgq6\" class=\"hlh-reg-faq-answer\">\r\n<p>The FDA QMSR (effective February 2, 2026) aligns U.S. requirements with ISO 13485:2016, making a single IQ\/OQ\/PQ validation package satisfy both regulators. FDA inspection focus areas for blasting: process validation package completeness, DMR parameter specification, sample DHRs showing parameter records, operator training, media certs, and any non-conformance or CAPA records related to blasting deviations. Electronic DHR records must comply with 21 CFR Part 11 if used for lot release decisions.<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"hlh-reg-cta\">\r\n<h2>Source Compliant Blasting Media with Full ISO 13485 Supplier Documentation<\/h2>\r\n<p>Jiangsu Henglihong Technology supports medical device manufacturers&#8217; supplier qualification requirements with full Certificates of Analysis, chemical composition documentation, particle size distribution data, and batch traceability for glass beads, aluminum oxide, and specialty blasting media.<\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/contact\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Request Supplier Documentation Package<\/a><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p><script>(function(){var b=document.querySelectorAll('.hlh-reg-faq-btn');b.forEach(function(btn){btn.addEventListener('click',function(){var e=this.getAttribute('aria-expanded')==='true',a=document.getElementById(this.getAttribute('aria-controls'));b.forEach(function(x){x.setAttribute('aria-expanded','false');var y=document.getElementById(x.getAttribute('aria-controls'));if(y)y.style.maxHeight='0'});if(!e){this.setAttribute('aria-expanded','true');a.style.maxHeight=a.scrollHeight+'px'}})})})();<\/script><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u2190 Abrasive Blasting for Medical Devices: Complete Guide ISO 13485  [&#8230;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13678,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,175,138],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","category-industry","category-resource"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13676"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13676\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13691,"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13676\/revisions\/13691"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13678"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlh-js.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}